Reviews for Shiloh, 1862
Book list
From Booklist, Copyright © American Library Association. Used with permission.
As with all major Civil War battles, standard histories of Shiloh already exist (e.g., Shiloh, by Larry J. Daniel, 1997). So to make his 150th-anniversary account interesting and distinctive, Groom, of Forrest Gump fame, injects the eyewitness experiences of several individuals into an exposition of the battle's strategic context and tactical course. Two soldiers remain recognizable today (explorer Henry Morton Stanley and writer Ambrose Bierce), while others Groom rescues from primary sources. Diarist Josie Underwood, a belle of Bowling Green, Kentucky, had suitors who fought at Shiloh, while Elsie Duncan, a nine-year-old in 1862, later recounted the maelstrom that swept over her family's farm. Their words complement those of surviving soldiers, whose gory descriptions of the combat's havoc enforce the perception of Shiloh as a chaotic, out-of-control battle. It certainly did not unfold as planned by either commander not by Grant, who did not expect a battle, and not by the attacker, Confederate Albert Sidney Johnston. Including pertinent military detail about weapons and organization, Groom's compositional acumen makes Shiloh move quickly, vividly, graphically, and perfectly for armchair buff and battlefield visitor alike.--Taylor, Gilbert Copyright 2010 Booklist
Kirkus
Copyright © Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Copyright Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.
Library Journal
(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
In chronicling the bloody fighting of the Battle of Shiloh in Tennessee 150 years ago, novelist and historian Groom (Kearny's March: The Epic Creation of the American West, 1846-1847) compels the reader to appreciate the enormous toll to both sides owing to advanced arms, outmoded battle tactics, and poor generalship. Although Groom lays responsibility on both sides, he especially blames General Grant and General Sherman, serving under him, for failure to fortify positions, properly reconnoiter, read the signs of enemy advances, and have a battle plan in case of attack. Union forces prevailed owing to late-arriving reinforcements and Confederate failure to capitalize on earlier gains. Groom's gripping narrative is full of absorbing firsthand accounts from drummer boys, officers and enlisted men, nurses, and civilians, including future writers such as Lew Wallace (Ben-Hur) and Ambrose Bierce ("An Occurrence at Owl Creek Bridge"). In conclusion, Groom sees Shiloh as a learning experience for Grant, who finally understood that no single battle, no matter how costly or geographically significant, could end the rebellion: the Union could be restored only through the total conquest of the South. VERDICT A provocatively rendered and persuasively argued study that demands a central place in Civil War historiography. Highly recommended. (Illustrations and editorial apparatus not seen.)-John Carver Edwards, Univ. of Georgia Libs., Cleveland (c) Copyright 2012. Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.
Publishers Weekly
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved
Groom enhances his solid reputation as a writer of general audience military history with this narrative of the Civil War's first major battle in the west. Shiloh was fought by armies unprepared in every way. Men and regiments were untrained; armament was improvised; senior officers were no more than uniformed civilians. Only the few experienced commanders, like Ulysses Grant and William Sherman of the Union, and Confederates Albert Sidney Johnson and P.G.T. Beauregard, had any idea of what to expect when their neophyte soldiers met on April 6-7, 1862. What they endured was a savage death grapple in a remote corner of Tennessee. Groom skillfully uses personal narratives to reconstruct the horror of slaughter pens like the Hornets' Nest , where Union troops drove back eight attacks before surrendering. Disorganized by victory, the Confederates stumbled, then retreated as Union reinforcements began reaching the field. The battle was a tactical draw, not for lack of courage but from want of skill. "A determined effort by Grant to pursue the retreating Confederate army likely would have ended the Civil War in a fell swoop," concludes Groom (Kearny's March: The Epic Creation of the American West, 1846-1847), in a harsh assessment of Grant's leadership at a crucial moment. Agent: Theron Raines, Raines and Raines. (Mar.) (c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved.
