Hours

CurbsideStill available
Monday8-6; curbside service available
Tuesday8-6; curbside service available
Wednesday8-6; curbside service available
Thursday8-8; curbside service available
Friday8-5; curbside service available
Saturday8-3; curbside service available
SundayClosed

Reviews for The Divider

by Peter Baker and Susan Glasser

Book list
From Booklist, Copyright © American Library Association. Used with permission.

With so many books about Donald Trump on the shelves and still more in the pipeline, how does a new one distinguish itself? In this case, it’s through the journalistic chops of coauthors Baker, the New York Times White House correspondent, and the New Yorker's Glasser. There's also the book's heft: at more than 700 pages, it draws on information from hundreds of interviews (many, unfortunately, off the record) as well as written accounts, personal papers, and texts. For now anyway, The Divider is the definitive account of Trump's White House years. Much of the story is, of course, known. Those who've avidly followed the twists, turns, and intrigues of the Trump administration will find plenty that's familiar. Still, there are juicy surprises, as when Melania Trump subtly dissuades Chris Christie from taking the Chief of Staff job by subtly reminding him about the influential and ever-present Jared and Ivanka. More somberly, the book discloses that House Speaker Kevin McCarthy was on the phone with Trump when he heard the shot that killed January 6 rioter Ashli Babbitt. At the time, the President was telling the Speaker, "I guess these people are more upset about the election than you are." What is shown so clearly here is that this country's democracy is held in place by norms, but from the first, Donald Trump had no interest in norms. It wasn't just his breaking them; half the time, he didn't know nor care that they existed. As the narrative plows inexorably forward, readers see normalcy turned on its head, institutions fail, people lose their way (while others felt it was important not to be replaced by a sycophant), and the determination to hold power, well, trumping everything else. The story continues, but Baker and Glasser give readers an indispensable starting point.


Kirkus
Copyright © Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.

The insurrection on Jan. 6, 2021, was no anomaly but instead “the inexorable culmination of a sustained four-year war on the institutions and traditions of American democracy.” New York Times reporter Baker and New Yorker staffer Glasser are no admirers of Donald Trump or his MAGA agenda, the latter of which they hold to be a cynical non-ideology defined mostly by opposition: Anything Barack Obama might have deemed good, Trump deems bad. When Trump became president in 2016, the “Axis of Adults” surrounding him hoped fervently that he would develop a coherent doctrine that could be supported and reinforced by key staff members. They were soon disabused of that sensible notion. Trump did not learn, did not change, and did not budge. He ruled by division, and his base was an us-versus-them proposition, his White House an arena of roiling rivalries; everyone took part in the scheming. The authors are particularly good when they bring Melania Trump onto the stage. It’s a guilty pleasure to watch Melania maneuver Ivanka out of photographic shoots and remove her from guest lists. Trump, thin-skinned as only a self-doubting narcissist can be, was well aware of how disliked he was. As Baker and Glasser note, in his years in office he “would never go out to a restaurant in Washington that was not owned by his company,” knowing he would otherwise be booed and heckled. That did not deter Trump from playing his zero-sum games, and it ended with the only time a president refused to transfer power peaceably. Unfortunately, he left another legacy: Although Trump was “the most politically unsuccessful occupant of the White House in generations,” he altered the political landscape in such a way that “the Trump era is not past; it is America’s present and maybe even its future.” A scorched-earth account of an utterly failed presidency. Copyright © Kirkus Reviews, used with permission.


Publishers Weekly
(c) Copyright PWxyz, LLC. All rights reserved

Married journalists Baker and Glasser follow up The Man Who Ran Washington with a comprehensive and scathing chronicle of the Trump administration. Contending that the January 6 Capitol riot was “the culmination of a sustained, four-year war on the institutions and traditions of American democracy,” the authors deliver a blow-by-blow account of that assault as it unfolded. Familiar themes emerge: a White House riven by rivalries and factions from day one (Reince Priebus v. Steve Bannon; Kellyanne Conway v. everybody); an astonishingly ill-informed and erratic president constrained by an “Axis of Adults” (whose own “pettiness... suggested a middle school cafeteria”); the “unique symbiosis” between Fox News and Trump; Republican lawmakers and conservative activists swallowing their distaste for the president in order to advance their own agendas. But Baker and Glasser, enriching their own reporting with the juiciest material from the slew of books about the Trump presidency, fashion a coherent narrative out of the chaos, offering lucid and insightful accounts of the Muslim travel ban, talks with North Korea’s Kim Jong-un, the Mueller investigation, Brett Kavanaugh’s confirmation hearings, both impeachment trials, and more. There’s also plenty of color, including a “pumped up” Trump “sucking down Diet Cokes and chomping on a Hershey’s chocolate bar” as he awaited the reaction to FBI director James Comey’s firing. The result is the most encyclopedic account of the Trump presidency yet published. (Sept.)


Choice
Copyright American Library Association, used with permission.

It is often said that journalism is the first rough draft of history, and when it comes to the Trump presidency, there exists a plethora of books and articles by journalists about former president Donald Trump. Among the most important are Maggie Haberman's Confidence Man (2022) and Bob Woodward's Fear (2018). The Divider by Baker, the chief White House correspondent for the New York Times, and Glasser, a staff writer for The New Yorker, joins the ranks of the best of these publications. The authors have written a highly critical book about their subject based on hundreds of interviews, including two lengthy interviews with Trump. They conclude that Trump presided over one of the most unsuccessful presidencies in generations, describing him as an insecure president who stressed loyalty to himself as a paramount value. Of his many other shortcomings, Baker and Glasser also write about his lying, citing 30,573 false and misleading claims that Trump made during his tenure in office, leading up to the “big lie” about the 2020 election. Well written with an exhaustive number of footnoted sources, this is an important indictment of the Trump presidency. Summing Up: Highly recommended. General readers through faculty; professionals. --Jack Robert Fischel, emeritus, Millersville University


Library Journal
(c) Copyright Library Journals LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Media Source, Inc. No redistribution permitted.

Baker, chief White House correspondent for the New York Times, and New Yorker staffer Glasser yank aside the curtain on the Trump White House, aiming to provide a thoroughgoing history embedded with new information and insights, from the shock beginning to the violent end. Their main argument: Trump spent four years seeking to emulate the foreign autocrats he so admired.

Back